+91 9704 999 899

training@madoverinsurance.com

Gutenberg IT Park, Kondapur, Hyd-84

Swing Rate-Non-Proportional Reinsurance

December 4, 2024

Allianz has bought from Munich

January 18, 2024

Is compares the insurance cost

December 27, 2024

Yesterday, Nagarajan Girishankar in one

January 15, 2025

Yesterday we discussed about RSM

January 18, 2025

Normally CAT XL is bought

December 24, 2024

Health Insurance in 2023-24 constitutes

Reinsurance

Swing Rate-Non-Proportional Reinsurance

Share to

I have always wondered why Reinsured’s buy the layer with Swing Rate? Are they not better off retaining that layer? That too with a loading of 100/70.

I can understand why Reinsurers sell it. But never why Cedants buy it? Not even sure whether they realize that loading of 100/70 means a loading of 42.5% and not 30% on the burning cost.

Some brokers try to justify saying there is Minimum rate and Maximum Rate. I tell them-look at the range between minimum and maximum rate-it is so wide that more likely than not the final calculation will fall within this range.

Some brokers tell me-this layer has been bought for over a decade-how can we convince the cedant to retain it? My answer is simple-take last 5 or 10 years statistics of the final premium paid to reinsurers versus the claims recovered from this layer from reinsurers. Decision making becomes very simple.

I would have asked this question to many brokers and cedant buying their lowest layer with Swing Rates. I could never get a satisfactory reply. Only reply I heard is this is being bought for many years. I would be more than happy to get a satisfactory reply -I would be happy to change my views and drop this question for ever.

Blog by Atmaram Cheruvu

0
    0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop